|
Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2018 17:17:42 GMT 2
Hi, I am really hating on the direction the COD/Battlefield franchises are going. My idea of a great FPS is COD Modern Warfare II, Battlefield 2 or Battlefield 1942 where the battlefield is based (at least mostly) on REAL world guns, capabilities and mechanics. I'm a history nut at heart. Can we just please leave the futuristic fighting to Halo and Titanfall? Battlefield Hardline never tickled my fancy because I thought it was idiotic to have Cops versus Bad Guys. I played the demo of it and the single player campaign bored me to death. Multiplayer was better, but not worth $60 IMO. I get that games evolve, but I really feel there is a void in the gaming sphere that begs for a realistic simulation instead of a futuristic "idea" of warfare. COD and Battlefield used to fill that void for me, but sadly they've gone a direction that is making me look elsewhere. Anyone else feel my pain? Please help. Thanks! I didn't find the right solution from the Internet. References: www.theverge.com/2015/11/2/9657898/ground-pounding-wall-running-jet-packs-whats-next-the-ability-to-fartDisability Marketing Examples
|
|